Subscribe via feed.

Well, we can forget about the Brits being pet lovers

Posted by RenB on March 22, 2009 – 6:37 am

Horrible story…


This post is under “Uncategorized” and has 6 respond so far.
If you enjoy this article, make sure you subscribe to my RSS Feed.

6 Responds so far- Add one»

  1. 1. Mentis Fugit Said:

    Rich pricks are rich pricks, wherever you find them.

  2. 2. Terrible Said:

    That was my first thought too Mentis that they were just typical rich assholes.

    Somewhat OT but has anyone else seen this story about the horses in California. Some place that had been finding homes for wild and abused horses is now getting a lot of them returned because people claim they can’t afford them anymore.
    http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/03/22/homeless.horses/index.html

  3. 3. Anntichrist S. Coulter Said:

    I’m not surprised at that, either, Terrible. Psycho-Cunt “adopted” a mustang, but never spent the time to saddle-break her, and then, eventually, she wasn’t there anymore, or they didn’t talk about her anymore…

    What pisses me off about the Spanish dogs being locked inside of homes to starve, or put out in the middle of the interstate, or at the last fucking minute outside the airport, is that THERE ARE PROCEDURES IN PLACE TO PROTECT THESE ANIMALS, but the rich bastards are too fucking NARCISSISTIC AND LAZY to even BOTHER picking up the phone to call the local animal shelter. I’m surprised that nobody’s found any of Paris Hilton’s purse-rats abandoned somewhere, but then, she can probably hire somebody to flush them down the toilet.

    Anybody who considers animals “fashion accessories,” or “home accoutrements,” DOESN’T DESERVE ANIMALS. And Child Welfare ought to be checking-in on their spawn, too. PETS ARE NOT FUCKING TOYS, PEOPLE. You don’t throw ‘em in the back of the closet when you’re bored with them.

  4. 4. Anntichrist S. Coulter Said:

    Y’know, after reading that whole article, Terrible, I really wanna go to California and burn a few houses down. These cockbites aren’t homeless, they’re not losing SHIT, they can still afford TRAINERS for the horses that they KEEP, but they can ditch a horse that they call “their children,” with nary a flinch.

    As I was saying, about “fashion accessories”… “But this horse was VALUABLE, she won PRIZES and TROPHIES…”

    Not, “I love this horse,” or “I know this horse’s NAME,” nope. She’s just another COMMODITY to be frittered away by narcissists, when they become “inconvenienced” by the GLOBAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE that’s FUCKING THE REST OF US.

    Be nice if the NDNs and Mexicans could take California back and put these douchebags out in the field, picking produce.

  5. 5. Terrible Said:

    Exactky Annti. They couldn’t give up the Porsce or the weekends on the yacht instead.

    Maybe the NDNs and the Mexicans would actually love, care for and use the horses too.

  6. 6. Anntichrist S. Coulter Said:

    Yeah, but where in the hell would they get the money to feed ‘em? Not like the gubmint left any GRAZING LAND out there, that’s why they keep “culling” the mustangs. When there’s strip-mining and water-rights to auction, who gives a fuck about a buncha non-thoroughbred horses?

    Y’ever notice how the places that the gubmint picked for most of the post-Trail-of-Tears reservations had very little foliage left? Wouldn’t want those non-citizens/not-quite-humans to be able to sustain their own livestock and livelihoods, now would we?

    Yeah, gnaw on a fuckin’ cactus, kiddo. That’ll getcha though the Arizona summer. Just ask John McSenile.

    And then there’s the NDNs who tried to grow INDUSTRIAL HEMP, on SOVEREIGN LANDS, and yet the fucking DEA keeps coming in there, every fucking harvest-time, and STEALING EVERY SINGLE STALK AND SEED. So much for THAT self-sufficiency idea, too. Sound familiar?

Post a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.